The Diary's Not for
Burning:
The Lifelong Diary Keeping of William Michael Rossetti
The British Diarist, August 2003, by Angela Thirlwell
Sibling of the famous Dante Gabriel
and Christina Rossetti, William Michael Rossetti (1829-1919)
was one of the original seven Pre-Raphaelite 'Brothers', keeper
of the PRB Journal, editor of the Germ and the glamorous group's
'catalytic agent' and mythmaker. He was a bohemian who was also
a taxman, critic and populariser of shocking contemporary art
for nervous Victorian gallery visitors, man of letters, biographer,
historian, autodidact, radical, liberal pragmatist, cosmopolitan,
artist, connoisseur and collector. Swinburne thought his starkly
realistic poem Mrs Holmes Grey 'beats everything but Balzac'
and artist John Brett called him 'the best judge [of art] I
know after John Ruskin'.
In spite of his Italian name and parentage (father Gabriele
Rossetti, an asylum seeker from Naples, became Professor of
Italian at King's College, London, and mother Frances Polidori
was three quarters Italian) William was born in London and never
considered himself anything other than British. Although he
fiercely identified with Italy in her struggle for unity and
independence, counted Garibaldi as his 'greatest and most flawless
personal hero' and loved the land of his ancestors which he
regarded, as he told the Italian Ambassador, as being his 'native
country almost in equal degree with England', William thought
of himself as English, his natural sphere of operation was always
England. Moreover he was a Londoner and never lived anywhere
else, although he was an extensive traveller and a natural cosmopolitan.
Throughout his long life William confided in a whole range of
private diaries. They provided the raw material for his publications
about the Pre-Raphaelite movement and for his thousands of surviving
letters. Because his siblings were regarded from infancy as
geniuses, they were not expected to go out to work. Therefore,
when the Rossetti fortunes declined with the failing health
of their paterfamilias, William's education was brusquely terminated.
In 1845, aged just fifteen, he began full-time employment as
a clerk at the Excise Office (later the Board of Inland Revenue),
not leaving until retirement at sixty-five in September 1894,
when he had achieved the senior position of Assistant Secretary.
His duties as a civil servant included daily experience in recording
minutes and making notes, a specific writing course which underpinned
a lifetime of keeping diaries.
Expertise in minute taking made William the logical choice as
administrator to the exciting young art movement founded in
1848 by Dante Gabriel Rossetti, William Holman Hunt and John
Everett Millais. As Secretary to the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood,
it was William's special function to keep a record of their
informal meetings and day-to-day doings in the P.R.B Journal,
an invaluable record of Pre-Raphaelite activities between 1849-1853.
William's P.R.B. Journal, published by William E. Fredeman in
1975, gives us the only first-hand insight, apart from a few
surviving letters, into the early days of this radical new art
movement. At their most vivacious, perhaps when William took
annual leave from the day-job, his P.R.B. Journal entries are
concise, informative and amusing:
'Tuesday 29th May 1849: I went in the morning to the Society
of British Artists… Scarcely anything good at the Gallery… Between
10 and 11 Hunt called…Talked and did portraits. We have received
a letter from Millais, who says that there's a most splendid
critique of his and Hunt's work in the Builder. Wednesday 30th
May 1849: …On going to the Class in the afternoon, I was told
that, on her unrobing [the Model's], she was unanimously requested
not to give herself so much trouble; and we have determined,
as the preferable alternative, to draw her dressed almost entirely.
She is very fat and at least 45.' (William himself was a far
more graceful model and was often asked in his spare time to
pose, although clothed, for the full-time artists in the group.)
The P.R.B. Journal was the diary of a group, written single-handedly
by William, and the first of his surviving diaries. Perhaps
it inspired him to keep his own personal diary or perhaps he
had been keeping a diary since childhood. William's diaries
that can be read today fall into three distinct categories:
travel diaries dating from 1855-1896; his séance diary of 1865-8;
and his regular, day by day diaries, the friend and confidant
of an intensely busy but sensitive and private man maintaining
two concurrent professional lives, one in the Revenue and one
as a prolific writer on art and literature. They were also the
repository for his radical political views, private thoughts,
ambitions and disappointments, and charted the course of his
erotically charged but ultimately tragic twenty-year marriage
to the tubercular artist, Lucy Madox Brown. William kept these
diurnal diaries throughout the central period of his life and
into old age, from at least 1866 until 1913 when he was eighty-four.
Diary keeping was a crucial aspect of his natural archival interests
which embraced writing biography, autobiography, bibliography,
anthologies, endless list making of works of art, books, finances,
travel expenses, and dozens of volumes of ephemera which he
bound up as Miscellanies - all strategies for preserving or
shaping the past. William published extracts from his diaries
in various books he edited, Ruskin: Rossetti: Preraphaelitism
(1899), Rossetti Papers 1862-1870 (1903), and used his diaries
as raw material for his great 2 volume biography of his brother
Dante Gabriel Rossetti (1895) and his own Reminiscences (1906).
But the great mass of his diaries today remain as unpublished
manuscripts in the Angeli-Dennis Collection at the University
of British Columbia, Vancouver, Rare Books and Special Collections,
and on microfilm at the Bodleian, Oxford.
'I feel a certain qualm at seeing that you mean to destroy your
old diaries', William wrote to his old friend, fellow Pre-Raphaelite
'Brother' and co-critic, Frederic George Stephens, on 22 August
1906. 'I don't mean to destroy mine: they will pass to one of
my children, & will, I suppose, be scarcely or not at all used
at any future time for any purpose which one could regret. However,
every man must judge for himself in such matters.' If William
had wanted anonymity or oblivion, he could always have chosen
the fire. But he chose transparency and entrusted himself to
posterity. His decision makes a direct parallel with his preference
for untouched photographs, and his warts and all approach to
writing biographies, even of some of his greatest heroes such
as the Romantic poet Shelley, and his own brother the artist-poet,
Dante Gabriel Rossetti.
Travel Diaries William was a keen tourist during the central
years of the nineteenth century, travelling almost annually
around Britain or to the Continent. These holidays from office
routine were carefully planned and anticipated, high spots of
his year. To express his sense of purposeful liberty he carried
with him a narrow, flip over pocket diary to record instant
verbal and visual impressions. These notebooks are much smaller
than the larger format exercise books he used for his regular
Diaries. There are clear signs that William re-read all his
diaries in later years, identifying sections to re-use in his
publications. In the surviving travel diaries nothing is crossed
out or pasted over. The focus is topographical and cultural.
Wherever he went he visited art galleries and exhibitions, sometimes
as part of his artistic self-education and sometimes specifically
as a reviewer. From his diary notes he worked up finished articles
on art and literature for the Victorian periodical press - to
which he was a prolific contributor.
With attractive decorative endpapers, the travel diary notebooks
he bought from a shop in the Strand were not cheap at two shillings
each, a further indication of how dearly he valued these holiday
weeks. And value was a key issue for William. On the back of
his diary entries are detailed accounts, how much he spent on
meals, railway tickets (2nd class) and laundry en route. He
budgeted economically down to the last franc. As well as this
simple arithmetic, the diaries are studded - in these years
before pocket cameras - with rapid drawings of what he saw,
often unusual details of church architecture, occasionally a
portrait, or diagram of a major art work. Sadly, many pages
are now faint and indistinct, almost illegible with time.
William's travel diary for 14 July - 10 August 1867 is one of
his most personal and atmospheric. He set off north for the
enchantments of Penkill Castle to visit the curious ménage à
trois of William and Letitia Bell Scott and Alice Boyd. Scottish
Penkill Castle was set in exquisite if drenched grounds and
hung with Bell Scott's captivating picture series The King's
Quair. In between downpours Alice suggested William should model
for a head in Scott's picture the Palace of Venus which turned
out 'quite recognizably like me.' Through the rain-spattered
dining room windows William glimpsed 'merely the ghost of Ailsa
Craig, which is properly the most striking object seen in the
distance'. Before going on later in his vacation to the operatic
pleasures of Paris, he relished the 'scattered and jagged rocks'
on the coast at Ardmullan where he quietly lamented 'no jellyfish,
hermit crab or cuttle bone'. Although a man for whom art and
aesthetic concerns were primary, he also noticed the details
of the animal world with genuine curiosity and compassion.
Always reading, writing or going for nature walks, William kept
his eyes peeled. 'Picked up a mole in coming along the only
one I ever saw walking about above ground: he was going along
at a good trundling pace'. One very wet day he found a young
swallow almost 'overcome by rain and chill: I warmed him up
again, and left him where his parents seemed likely to find
him'. Entirely self-sufficient in the years of his bachelorhood,
equally absorbed in rocks and glaciers, paintings, poetry or
moles, he never seemed lonely for a moment. He could find himself
in time alone, away from both office life and home life crammed
with Rossettis.
Séance
Diaries
B etween November 1865 and August 1868 William attended over
twenty séance sessions and kept Séance Diaries in which he recorded
and attempted to make sense of what he saw and heard. By his
mid-thirties, William had been close to deathbed scenes, his
father's in 1854, and Gabriel's wife, Lizzie Siddal's - probably
suicide by laudanum - more recently in 1862. Séance mania and
the discussion of apparently paranormal experience was at its
height during the mid-nineteenth century. William went to séances
in the spirit of research. As an agnostic who continually asked
himself questions about religion, it was an awkward but intriguing
subject for him.
William recorded his last séance in his special diary on Friday
14 August 1868. The craze had lasted just under three years.
Very late that night between midnight and 2 a.m. at Gabriel's
studio, William, Treffry Dunn (Gabriel's studio assistant) and
Fanny Cornforth (Gabriel's mistress) gathered on a whim round
a solid table in 'quasi-darkness'. Gabriel joined the group
as soon as rapping was heard under the table. Inevitably, perhaps,
it was Lizzie's spirit that invaded Gabriel's mind with recurrent,
torturing themes. 'Are you my wife? Yes - Are you now happy?
Yes - Happier than on earth? Yes - If I were now to join you,
should I be happy? Yes - Should I see you at once? No - Quite
soon? No. Tilt the table to the person you like best: it came
to G[abriel]. Do you now like F[anny]? Yes - But some while
ago you used not to like her? No - Did you pull her hair on
a particular occasion?' (William had witnessed it) 'Yes - Will
you pull her hair now? Yes.' But nothing transpired.
Gabriel asked Lizzie's spirit if it knew his father 'in the
world of Spirits? Yes.' He asked her to bring his father to
the table. After a short delay, he was thought to be present
although, unusually, he 'spoke' in English rather than Italian.
William asked the former Dante scholar, 'Do you see Dante in
your present condition? Yes - Were your Dantesque theories correct?
Yes - is Dante then really an atheist? Yes - Is Atheism true?
Yes - Then there is no God? No - is there such a being as Christ?
Yes - In other words, Christ is not God? Yes (i.e. he is not).
Do you know where Christina is? Yes - Is it the South of England?
Yes (Wrong: she is at Leeds.)' His answers faded out until 'the
manifestations came to a standstill'.
William's Séance Diaries came to a standstill, too, with this
final entry. He had aimed to record objectively everything he
observed. He had worried about logical plausibility and physical
explanations for psychic phenomena. He had suspected trickery
but he was open to experience. He had treated levitating tables
without levity and listened to 'messages' from the long and
newly dead. When his daughters tried ouija boards at the beginning
of the twentieth century, he could not resist joining in. 'Gabriel
professed to communicate with me, & to be happy', William noted.
He put some questions to test the genuineness of the spirit
'but nothing satisfactory came of them. As of old, I remain
unable to account for what happens'.
Regular Diaries
William's regular diary was a long-standing friend to him over
more than half a century. In it he recorded not only his day-to-day
doings, details of his literary work, family news but also close
accounts of what pictures and poetic projects his brother Gabriel
was currently engaged in. But in moments of intense emotional
crisis William abandoned his diary, sometimes for months, occasionally
for years at a time. One of the most painful events that bound
him to his brother was Gabriel's nervous breakdown and suicide
attempt in June 1872. 'This diary-work is becoming too painful
now if important matters are to be recorded, and too futile
and irritating if the unimportant are made to take their place.
I shall therefore drop it', which he did until November when
Gabriel had made an unexpected recovery, resumed work and was
living adulterously at Kelmscott with Janey Morris.
A decade later he discontinued his diary for three months after
witnessing the painful spectacle of Gabriel suffering an agonising
form of kidney-disease, precipitated by years of drug and alcohol
addiction. On the evening of Easter Day 9 April 1882, Gabriel
'fell back, threw his arms out, screamed out loud two or three
times close together' in a convulsive fit that distorted his
face, and immediately collapsed. It was 9.31 p.m. Within three
minutes Lucy appeared, having travelled all day from her father's
in Manchester. 'Lucy's arrival at the very moment almost', William
told Madox Brown, 'was an unspeakable comfort to me, & so continues'.
After three weeks compassionate leave, William returned to the
office. It was three months before he could resume writing his
diary again.
When William Rossetti had married the artist Lucy Madox Brown
on 31 March 1874, true to their unbelief at St. Pancras Register
Office, it was an alliance of two of the most resonant Pre-Raphaelite
names. Lucy had been appearing in William's diary with increasing
frequency during the late 1860s and early 1870s.
Marriage brought William undoubted happiness and five children
during its first decade. He recorded their births in his diary
with poetic precision and rueful humour. Arthur was born in
the frosty small hours of 28 February 1877: '4.16 a.m. Lucy
gave birth to a son: this is the anniversary of my father's
birth which. must have occurred, I believe, in 1783. Nothing
particularly bad happened till about 1. a.m: at 3.15 I had to
go round for the Surgeon, Gill, in a most brilliant frosty moonlight.
He accompanied me back, arriving by 3.45, & in another half
hour all was over. Lucy has gone on extremely well ever since,
& the baby, tho' grotesque enough in aspect, seems to be sound
& hearty.'
William's diary constantly referred to Lucy's health, or lack
of it. In 1877, after the birth of their second child, Arthur,
Lucy was exhausted and by January 1878 William confided to his
diary that Lucy's health was 'certainly not strong of late,
with persistent thinness & want of appetite'. He also noted
with his taxman's exactitude that the doctor's bills during
1877 amounted to a hefty £47.5.0d.
Three further children followed, Helen on 10 November 1879,
and finally twins Mary and Michael on 22 April 1881 - 'a serious
look-out'- as William sighed to his diary. On 6 May 1880 William
noted the healthy weights of his family: 'Self 11 st. 5, Lucy,
9-10, Olive (aged four and a half) 3-6'.
In 1892 William agonized about his sister, the poet Christina
Rossetti, who underwent an operation for breast cancer on 25
May. On 6 July he noted that Lucy had 'seldom been tolerably
well this year'. By November he accepted, if only in the privacy
of his diary, that Lucy's illness had changed from bronchial
pneumonia 'to an incipient form of phthisis' [pulmonary consumption
or tuberculosis] and he conceded inwardly that it had already
reached an advanced stage. "There is a line in Mrs. Browning
which reflects too truly the feeling of many of us as we get
old - 'All things grow sadder to me, one by one,'" he wrote
bleakly in his diary for 2 March 1894.
Lucy died eventually in San Remo, Italy, in the presence of
her family. William noted in a tiny, brown silk pocket book,
'Dear L died Thursday morning 12 April 1894 - 3 a.m. - asked
in pain to be turned over on left side - Olive did this and
[...] came the end. Her last words were addressed to Ol - O
how I love you dear'. Love was on her lips, if not for William.
Conscious to the last, 'her courage never flinched for a moment'
and William did not flinch from recording it.
Lucy's death on 12 April 1894, six months almost to the day
after the funeral of his closest friend and father-in-law, the
painter Ford Madox Brown, pitched William into one of his wordless
black holes, when as usual he refrained even from writing in
his diary. The gap was significant - four months from March
to July 1894. When he resumed his diary, he had taken the decision
to retire from the Inland Revenue, a decision which heralded
one of the most productive literary phases of his life.
For the first time since he began school at the age of seven,
he was his own master - with the novelty of scheduling his working
day to suit himself. When he put the final sentence to his Memoir
of Dante Gabriel, he calculated with schoolboyish exactitude
that the writing had 'occupied me 219 days, or 7 lunar months
3 weeks & 2 days'. He continued to maintain his relentless publishing
schedule in tandem with regular diary keeping until his mid-eighties.
William's diary thoughts oscillated between the past and present,
counterpointing national events with domestic, and moved without
drawing breath between his inner and outer worlds. The externals
of quotidian living, public events in art, literature, politics,
as well as dramatic and trivial physical ailments, the doings
of children, servants and animals absorbed him equally. But
the diaries rarely commented directly on his interior emotional
life. His diary entries together with their omissions, elisions,
reticences and long gaps revealed as well as concealed the complex
nature of this very private man.
Back to Articles